| Author |
Message |
|
KCMax
Global Moderator
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 22289 Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
|
 Troost developments
Seems like Troost is starting to build momentum on developments, so let's start a thread dedicated to happenings along Troost, primarily in the mid-town/university area. Ollie Gates begins building another shopping center
|
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:09 pm |
|
 |
|
Midtownkid
Penntower
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 10:27 pm Posts: 2432 Location: Washington, DC (formerly in Roanoke, KCMO)
|
 Re: Troost developments
Some of that block is empty. However I do like the building on the corner. That will be missed. New project trying to suburbanize the intersection even more. What is with the faux-colonial style??  
|
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:38 pm |
|
 |
|
kboish
Alameda Tower
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:25 am Posts: 1009 Location: Columbus Park
|
 Re: Troost developments
Yea, this is well intentioned, but won't be anything worth thinking about after it is completed. Wonder why they would feel a subruban style strip mall would be successful? I would think you'd want to drift off the urbabnity of the area.
|
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:52 pm |
|
 |
|
kcjak
Alameda Tower
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:02 pm Posts: 1087
|
 Re: Troost developments
I believe faux-colonial style is what Mr Gates used for this development at 47th/Paseo - brick buildings with white columns. Kinda reminds me of suburban developments in Memphis (or any place in the South) where a developer thinks they're adding some flair to an otherwise sterile strip mall.
I'd rather see the north side of this section developed - it's mostly empty lots or parking. I'm tempted to say 'any development is good development' here, but need I'll just hope for the best.
|
| Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:17 pm |
|
 |
|
WinchesterMysteryHouse
New York Life
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am Posts: 492
|
 Re: Troost developments
The Troost-area is now central to the punk community. The Studded Bird of the East Crossroads, has ceased and the action's moved into musician's houses and apartments.
Good opportunity to see some savage shows in small spaces, the best kind.
|
| Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:00 am |
|
 |
|
pash
Valencia Place
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:47 am Posts: 1535
|
 Re: Troost developments
It's really too bad Ollie Gates's efforts can't be put into a project that actually has a chance of becoming the core of some meaningful development.
|
| Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:35 am |
|
 |
|
FangKC
Mark Twain Tower
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:02 am Posts: 9553 Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
|
 Re: Troost developments
I was hoping that area, and parcel, would start development of a biomedical research corridor from the Stowers Institute and UMKC north towards Hospital Hill and Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences.
|
| Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:42 am |
|
 |
|
chaglang
Valencia Place
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:44 pm Posts: 1663 Location: Squier Park, Kanscity
|
 Re: Troost developments
As much as I want to complain about the design of the shopping center, it's the tenant mix that Gates gets in there that will determine whether this thing had a positive effect on the area or not. Considering that the first tenant into his previous development is a liquor store, I'm not too optimistic. I'm also disappointed that that Apple Market will only get a "facelift" - a new facade on that store means it will continue to be a pretty awful place to shop.
|
| Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:17 pm |
|
 |
|
Stockton
Colonnade
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:49 am Posts: 782 Location: KCMO
|
 Re: Troost developments
I don't even know what to say about this. This guy is suburbanizing land along our busiest bus line that just introduced MAX service. He's going to displace a few small businesses and tear down original urban buildings in the process. Being JUST east of the Plaza, southeast of wealthy neighborhoods, north of the Universities, having an existing semi-urban Walgreen and CVS, grocery store, and other businesses, as well as being on Brush Creek, this area has (had?) a great potenial to be urbanized and turned into an "east plaza" neighborhood center or something.
|
| Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:16 pm |
|
 |
|
Midtownkid
Penntower
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 10:27 pm Posts: 2432 Location: Washington, DC (formerly in Roanoke, KCMO)
|
 Re: Troost developments
Yeah it's pretty bad. Could reuse at least the corner building and build up a nice little block there. What's worse is that he stated there are no interested tenets as of now.
|
| Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:20 pm |
|
 |
|
WinchesterMysteryHouse
New York Life
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am Posts: 492
|
 Re: Troost developments
Pish posh this all you want online because it's invalid on the ground. Suburbanization works. The urbanization preferred here Is a fetish
|
| Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:58 pm |
|
 |
|
phuqueue
Valencia Place
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am Posts: 1842
|
 Re: Troost developments
Define "works"
|
| Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:36 am |
|
 |
|
pash
Valencia Place
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:47 am Posts: 1535
|
 Re: Troost developments
I think he must mean "provides a much less efficient and pleasant way of life that most people nevertheless embrace because it's cheap and convenient due to spending trillions of dollars over the last sixty years to subsidize and socialize the costs of driving".
|
| Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:42 pm |
|
 |
|
WinchesterMysteryHouse
New York Life
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am Posts: 492
|
 Re: Troost developments
Works? The suburbs don't look like Troost.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:53 pm |
|
 |
|
WinchesterMysteryHouse
New York Life
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am Posts: 492
|
 Re: Troost developments
And the River Market, suburb: doesn't work like Troost, Midtown.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:54 pm |
|
 |
|
smh
Valencia Place
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:40 am Posts: 1637 Location: River Market
|
 Re: Troost developments
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:46 pm |
|
 |
|
phuqueue
Valencia Place
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am Posts: 1842
|
 Re: Troost developments
You're right, all those abandoned strip malls have big empty parking lots in front of them, which so far only afflicts some parts of Troost (soon including this spot, I guess).
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:52 pm |
|
 |
|
WinchesterMysteryHouse
New York Life
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am Posts: 492
|
 Re: Troost developments
Plenty empty lots, paved and otherwise. If a mixed use urban environment were attractive, in terms of quality of life, some baller like Gates would've flipped the urban fabric on 31st & Troost. Urbanization is my preference but I'm not holding my breath.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:33 pm |
|
 |
|
phuqueue
Valencia Place
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am Posts: 1842
|
 Re: Troost developments
"Quality of life" has nothing to do with it, it's all about economic incentives. "The suburbs don't look like Troost," but the suburbs don't look like Paris either. Suburban development exists not because it necessarily "works" on its own merits but because every level of our government has incentivized it in myriad different ways.
|
| Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:56 pm |
|
 |
|
chaglang
Valencia Place
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:44 pm Posts: 1663 Location: Squier Park, Kanscity
|
 Re: Troost developments
Exactly. If suburbs just "worked", then people would still be flocking to Raytown and Grandview, or even northern Johnson County. 
|
| Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:56 pm |
|
|