View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:58 am



Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Troost developments 
Author Message
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 22289
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Post Troost developments
Seems like Troost is starting to build momentum on developments, so let's start a thread dedicated to happenings along Troost, primarily in the mid-town/university area.

Ollie Gates begins building another shopping center

Quote:
Barbecue giant Ollie Gates of Gates Bar-B -Q is beginning phase-three of his plans to bring economic development to the east side of Kansas City, Mo. Gates is building a new 30,000 square foot shopping center on the southeast corner of 47th and Troost.
“What it really means to me is that progress is being made in the area where I had something to do with it,” Gates explained.
The new strip mall is the second strip shopping center built by Gates. The first one is a 15,000 square foot building that opened last fall. At least two businesses are now tenants there.
“Nothing has been rented out; we’re doing this speculating and hoping that the transformation of that area will bring some notable businesses across Troost,” Gates said.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:09 pm
Profile WWW
Penntower
Penntower
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 10:27 pm
Posts: 2432
Location: Washington, DC (formerly in Roanoke, KCMO)
Post Re: Troost developments
Some of that block is empty. However I do like the building on the corner. That will be missed. New project trying to suburbanize the intersection even more. What is with the faux-colonial style??

Image

Image


Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:38 pm
Profile
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:25 am
Posts: 1009
Location: Columbus Park
Post Re: Troost developments
Yea, this is well intentioned, but won't be anything worth thinking about after it is completed. Wonder why they would feel a subruban style strip mall would be successful? I would think you'd want to drift off the urbabnity of the area.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:52 pm
Profile
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:02 pm
Posts: 1087
Post Re: Troost developments
I believe faux-colonial style is what Mr Gates used for this development at 47th/Paseo - brick buildings with white columns. Kinda reminds me of suburban developments in Memphis (or any place in the South) where a developer thinks they're adding some flair to an otherwise sterile strip mall.

I'd rather see the north side of this section developed - it's mostly empty lots or parking. I'm tempted to say 'any development is good development' here, but need I'll just hope for the best.


Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:17 pm
Profile
New York Life
New York Life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am
Posts: 492
Post Re: Troost developments
The Troost-area is now central to the punk community.
The Studded Bird of the East Crossroads, has ceased and the action's moved into musician's houses and apartments.

Good opportunity to see some savage shows in small spaces, the best kind.


Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:00 am
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:47 am
Posts: 1535
Post Re: Troost developments
It's really too bad Ollie Gates's efforts can't be put into a project that actually has a chance of becoming the core of some meaningful development.


Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:35 am
Profile
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 4:02 am
Posts: 9553
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Post Re: Troost developments
I was hoping that area, and parcel, would start development of a biomedical research corridor from the Stowers Institute and UMKC north towards Hospital Hill and Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences.


Fri Jan 27, 2012 6:42 am
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:44 pm
Posts: 1663
Location: Squier Park, Kanscity
Post Re: Troost developments
As much as I want to complain about the design of the shopping center, it's the tenant mix that Gates gets in there that will determine whether this thing had a positive effect on the area or not. Considering that the first tenant into his previous development is a liquor store, I'm not too optimistic. I'm also disappointed that that Apple Market will only get a "facelift" - a new facade on that store means it will continue to be a pretty awful place to shop.


Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:17 pm
Profile WWW
Colonnade
Colonnade

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 7:49 am
Posts: 782
Location: KCMO
Post Re: Troost developments
I don't even know what to say about this. This guy is suburbanizing land along our busiest bus line that just introduced MAX service. He's going to displace a few small businesses and tear down original urban buildings in the process. Being JUST east of the Plaza, southeast of wealthy neighborhoods, north of the Universities, having an existing semi-urban Walgreen and CVS, grocery store, and other businesses, as well as being on Brush Creek, this area has (had?) a great potenial to be urbanized and turned into an "east plaza" neighborhood center or something.


Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:16 pm
Profile YIM
Penntower
Penntower
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 10:27 pm
Posts: 2432
Location: Washington, DC (formerly in Roanoke, KCMO)
Post Re: Troost developments
Yeah it's pretty bad. Could reuse at least the corner building and build up a nice little block there. What's worse is that he stated there are no interested tenets as of now.


Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:20 pm
Profile
New York Life
New York Life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am
Posts: 492
Post Re: Troost developments
Pish posh this all you want online because it's invalid on the ground. Suburbanization works. The urbanization preferred here Is a fetish


Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:58 pm
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am
Posts: 1842
Post Re: Troost developments
Define "works"


Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:36 am
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:47 am
Posts: 1535
Post Re: Troost developments
I think he must mean "provides a much less efficient and pleasant way of life that most people nevertheless embrace because it's cheap and convenient due to spending trillions of dollars over the last sixty years to subsidize and socialize the costs of driving".


Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:42 pm
Profile
New York Life
New York Life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am
Posts: 492
Post Re: Troost developments
Works? The suburbs don't look like Troost.


Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:53 pm
Profile
New York Life
New York Life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am
Posts: 492
Post Re: Troost developments
And the River Market, suburb: doesn't work like Troost, Midtown.


Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:54 pm
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:40 am
Posts: 1637
Location: River Market
Post Re: Troost developments
WinchesterMysteryHouse wrote:
And the River Market, suburb: doesn't work like Troost, Midtown.


:-k


Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:46 pm
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am
Posts: 1842
Post Re: Troost developments
WinchesterMysteryHouse wrote:
Works? The suburbs don't look like Troost.

You're right, all those abandoned strip malls have big empty parking lots in front of them, which so far only afflicts some parts of Troost (soon including this spot, I guess).


Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:52 pm
Profile
New York Life
New York Life
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:54 am
Posts: 492
Post Re: Troost developments
Plenty empty lots, paved and otherwise.
If a mixed use urban environment were attractive, in terms of quality of life, some baller like Gates would've flipped the urban fabric on 31st & Troost.
Urbanization is my preference but I'm not holding my breath.


Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:33 pm
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 4:33 am
Posts: 1842
Post Re: Troost developments
"Quality of life" has nothing to do with it, it's all about economic incentives. "The suburbs don't look like Troost," but the suburbs don't look like Paris either. Suburban development exists not because it necessarily "works" on its own merits but because every level of our government has incentivized it in myriad different ways.


Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:56 pm
Profile
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:44 pm
Posts: 1663
Location: Squier Park, Kanscity
Post Re: Troost developments
phuqueue wrote:
"Quality of life" has nothing to do with it, it's all about economic incentives. "The suburbs don't look like Troost," but the suburbs don't look like Paris either. Suburban development exists not because it necessarily "works" on its own merits but because every level of our government has incentivized it in myriad different ways.


Exactly. If suburbs just "worked", then people would still be flocking to Raytown and Grandview, or even northern Johnson County.

WinchesterMysteryHouse wrote:
If a mixed use urban environment were attractive, in terms of quality of life, some baller like Gates would've flipped the urban fabric on 31st & Troost.

:?


Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:56 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 150 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware.